Insights
/
Capital Markets
Strategic Article
·
Capital Markets
·
1
Minute Read

Are SPACs a Cheaper Way to Go Public?

SPACs present a more complex cost structure than their promoters typically acknowledge. While they avoid some traditional IPO costs including the S-1 registration process timeline, the structural dilution from founder shares, the redemption risk from public shareholders, and the warrants issued to SPAC sponsors create a total cost of capital that often exceeds that of a comparable direct listing or conventional IPO. For companies evaluating their path to the public markets, the relevant comparison is the full-loaded cost including dilution, not the headline transaction costs.

Author photo
Marcus Magarian
Managing Director
September 1, 2021
Article featured image
Key Question

Are SPACs actually cheaper than conventional IPOs when full structural costs are accounted for?

SPACs appear cheaper than conventional IPOs but the full-loaded cost including founder share dilution, warrants, and redemption risk frequently exceeds traditional alternatives.

Key Takeaways

- SPACs allow companies to go public through a merger with an existing public shell, avoiding the traditional S-1 IPO process timeline - Structural dilution from founder shares, sponsor warrants, and redemption mechanics creates a true cost of capital that often exceeds conventional IPO costs - The redemption risk creates execution uncertainty: if too many SPAC shareholders redeem, the target company receives less capital than anticipated - Post-merger SPAC performance has broadly underperformed conventional IPOs, suggesting the cost structure is real despite the initial valuation opacity - Companies considering SPACs should model the full-loaded cost including dilution and compare it to direct listing and conventional IPO alternatives

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, or SPACs, have become a popular alternative to traditional IPOs for companies seeking a faster path to the public markets. But what is the real cost of a SPAC, and is it truly a cheaper way to go public? A SPAC is a shell company that raises capital through its own IPO with the intention of acquiring a private company, effectively taking that company public through the merger. The target company avoids the lengthy traditional IPO roadshow process and gains access to public capital markets more quickly. However, the perceived cost advantage of SPACs deserves scrutiny. While SPACs avoid some of the upfront costs of a traditional IPO, they come with their own fee structures, including the SPAC sponsor's promote, typically 20% of the shares, dilution from warrants issued to early investors, and redemption rights that can leave the merged company with less cash than anticipated. Dilution is often the most significant hidden cost. When SPAC investors exercise their redemption rights before the merger, the resulting entity may have a much smaller capital base than originally targeted. This has led some companies that went public via SPAC to trade well below their merger valuations. For companies evaluating their path to the public markets, the choice between a traditional IPO, a SPAC, and a direct listing should be made with a clear understanding of all costs and trade-offs. Chatsworth Securities advises companies on capital structure and public market strategy, helping them navigate these decisions with a full picture of the implications.
CS
Chatsworth View

SPACs present a more complex cost structure than their promoters typically acknowledge. While they avoid some traditional IPO costs including the S-1 registration process timeline, the structural dilution from founder shares, the redemption risk from public shareholders, and the warrants issued to SPAC sponsors create a total cost of capital that often exceeds that of a comparable direct listing or conventional IPO. For companies evaluating their path to the public markets, the relevant comparison is the full-loaded cost including dilution, not the headline transaction costs.

When to speak with Chatsworth

You may benefit from an advisory conversation if your board is evaluating timing, valuation expectations, buyer universe quality, or diligence readiness. Chatsworth provides senior-led perspective on process design and execution risk independently of whether a mandate results.

Speak with the team →
Filed under:
M&A & Capital Markets
Strategic Article
Read More on this topic

Related Insights

Speak with Chatsworth

Turn Market Perspective Into Transaction Strategy

If this insight raised a question relevant to your situation, Chatsworth Securities can help frame the strategic alternatives, prepare the process, and engage the right market.

Contact ChatsworthBrowse All Insights